NCP Member-Only Blog > Visiting Candidate Report: Vanessa Martinache

Visiting Candidate Report: Vanessa Martinache

posted on Nov 27, 2019
Candidate : Vanessa Martinache
Home Institute: The Paris Psychoanalytical Institute (IPP) attached to the Paris Psychoanalytical Society (SPP), France
Hosting Institute: New Center for Psychoanalysis (NCP), Los Angeles, USA
Visiting Candidate Program (VCP) Period: Half a day on October 30,2019
 
I have been a French Candidate at the IPP since 2015. As I come to Los Angeles several times a year for vacation, I was recently starting to wonder how psychoanalytic institutes were working there. Because of the very rich experience from my young years spent achieving a master’s degree in the US, my curiosity kept growing and growing about what such a training program could be like.  
 
Knowing no one practicing psychoanalysis in the US, I had no idea how to get such information. Even though I am quite familiar with the International Psychoanalytic Studies Organization (IPSO) meetings and conferences, I didn’t know much about the Visiting Candidate Program (VCP).
 
I decided to give it a try and contacted the IPSO VP-Elect for North America located in California. I have to admit that it was with little hope because of the very last-minute demand and also for such a very short time period -- I only had one day available.
But the IPSO VP-Elect acted quickly! He proposed that I choose one of the three IPA institutes in Los Angeles to visit: The New Center for Psychoanalysis (NCP), The Los Angeles Institute for Psychoanalytic Studies (LAISPS), and The Psychoanalytic Center of California (PCC).  
 
As a very first step into the LA psychoanalytic arena I chose to visit his institute, the NCP, the only one that is part of the American Psychoanalytic Association (APsaA).
 
At NCP the psychoanalytic path is organized into four years of courses and in supervisions.
I was offered to sit in on two courses: 
 
  • “Dreams”, a 3rd year course, facilitated by Beverly Feinstein
  • “Intersubjectivity”, a 4th year course, facilitated by Jeffrey Tropp and Kristen Melnyk
 
Both were small classes of 4-5 candidates. In the “dreams” course we compared two texts, one from James L. Fosshage and one from Gary Grenell from the perspective of the psychoanalyst role when a dream is told in session. The Freudian, inter-subjectivist and Bionian perspectives were discussed. Then a clinical case was presented by a candidate from their own practice and we tried to understand how the dream was organizing the client's affects. In the “Intersubjectivity” course and based on a James L. Fosshage and Carol A. Munschauer text we discussed the analysts’ enactments and the theory of change. 
 
NCP is a nonprofit psychoanalytic center. To be eligible for an adult psychoanalytic training program one must hold a valid license to practice in the State of California. Most of the candidates are either social workers, psychologists, psychiatrists or have a license in marriage and family therapy. One also should be in a personal analysis throughout the training program. The first year must be 4-5 sessions per week; and may decrease to 3-5 sessions per week after that and may possibly be reduced to 2 sessions per week in the later years of training prior to graduation.  
 
There are three supervised training cases required, where the candidate has one session per week of 1-on-1 supervision for each training case. The first training case must be seen 4-5 times per week for at least the first year, and then may be reduced to 3-5 times per week. The second and third training cases may be seen 3-5 times per week from the beginning. One training case must be of the opposite gender, one may be an adolescent, and one must be a low-fee NCP Clinic case. There are separate requirements for the Child Analytic Program.   
 
The curriculum is pluralistic with an emphasis on Freud during the 1st year and then the evolution of theory going from ego psychology, object relations, and self-psychology to intersubjective and relational theory. Bion, Klein, Winnicott, attachment theory, and neuroscience are part of the program. 
 
Most often classes and clinical case studies emphasize the analytic relationship (from object relations to relational theory). Some classes are divided by a symptom approach or a relational approach: Couples, Addictions, Mood Disorders, Character Disorders, etc.
There are also specific classes on contemporary issues such as Gender and Sexuality, Psychoanalysis and Film, etc.
 
The main differences with the French IPP lie:
  • In the eligibility process, for which we at the French IPP should have completed a minimum of a 3-year personal psychoanalysis at 3 sessions per week (with a member of SPP or IPA) before applying to the Institute. One can apply at any point during the year and if accepted, can begin seminars and supervision immediately. The French model is considering that one's analysis is first and foremost a personal endeavour, the desire to become an analyst must be elaborated in the course of one's analysis in order to understand the different elements that motivate us, that unless one has worked through enough of one's own issues it is very difficult to handle the transference reactions of a patient.
  • In the supervisions, for which we must choose a group supervision and an individual one. 
  • Regarding the theory and clinical cases. At the French IPP we are not admitted in "classes". We freely choose our seminars which can be pursued for years after the training period. It means that seminars are not really specifically dedicated to candidates and are open to members of the Society. While there are no "required" courses, we are encouraged to take seminars on Freud, beginning treatment and initial consultations. Most of the curriculum is very Freudian oriented and the emphasis is on drives.
I sincerely appreciated this short visit to the NCP. I have been greatly welcomed by everyone. In the two courses in which I was involved, I found the atmosphere among candidates enthusiastic and friendly and the instructors greedy for candidates’ participation, which made the courses so alive. I hope to be able to make another visit to NCP in the future.
 
Finally, I would like to thank in particular:
Gerard Sobnosky, IPSO VP-elect for North America and Advanced clinical associate at the NCP, who organized my VCP in collaboration with Cheryl Difatta, the Institute Administrator and also the instructors Beverly Feinstein, Jeffrey Tropp and Kristen Melnyk.
 
I also would like to thank the IPP Director Ellen Sparer and Johanna Velt, a French IPSO Representative who encouraged me to ask for this visit.
 
Vanessa Martinache